The world's politicians
are managing the migration crisis with all the ineptitude they can
muster, which, as we know is plenty. The Roman Empire was no
paradise, but its end was largely brought about by people wanting
what the Romans' had. It led to what we euphemistically call the Dark
Ages.
Britain long ago chose,
in the wake of empire, to become a multicultural society. Some see
that as a wonderful and enriching thing, others complain it's
destroying our own culture and traditions. I tend to the former view,
but things aren't quite that simple there's an element of truth in
both positions, life is rarely black and white.
Even if one embraces
multiculturalism, has not an ounce of racism, religious bigotry or
prejudice about anything, unlimited migration does create problems
and people trafficking is a dangerous and evil abuse. Now, we can all
sit back and let our talented politicians deal with it, or speak up
for a better world.
Britain's answer is to
threaten to leave the European community unless we get control of our
borders back, whilst sending ships to Libyan waters to pick up
illegal immigrants and dump them on Italy. Of course we're not the
only ones doing it. We chose to become multicultural, it doesn't
mean we have the right to insist others do so too, it's their
decision, that is the democracy we're all so keen on.
Italy has a rich
culture and they're rightly proud of it, dumping all these people on
their doorstep isn't right. Nor is their economy in better shape to
deal with it. If you're going to rescue thousands of people you need
to have a policy as to what you're going to do with them afterwards.
(Just as if you go to war, you need a plan for the peace, the
successors of Bush and Blair please take note). By the way I'm all in
favour of saving lives at sea. I'm not quite so happy about people
deliberately taking stupid risks, especially when the message sent
out is 'put yourself at risk and we will not only rescue you, but
will help you complete your illegal journey (at least as far as
Italy, you can make your way to England or Germany on your own)'.
We are of course
encouraging the people traffickers and depleting countries who need
fit, strong and in many cases educated people to help build their own
countries. Naturally, once again it's not black and white, some are
economic migrants, some are fleeing genuine persecution. Some will
look for work and to make a contribution to society, others, possibly
in desperation, will turn to crime to support themselves. Even
violent crime, I've experienced it at first hand in Athens.
So the questions are:
Do we rescue migrants who've put themselves at risk in overcrowded
un-seaworthy boats? Do we use special forces to take out people
traffickers and their boats and resources? Do we return people whence
they came? If we don't return them, then where do we put them and is
it a sustainable answer? If there's not a sustainable solution to the
previous question, how do we help people build a life for themselves
in the countries they're currently leaving?
If you can answer all
these questions in a common sense way, with a degree of humanity and
in a way which will make the world a better place, perhaps you
should be running for office, in your own country, or in the European
parliament.
It's not just about
culture, bigotry, prejudice. It's also about overcrowding and the
pressure on health services, transport, housing, the environment and
it's about people having worthwhile lives in their own countries, not
splitting up families, not making the countries they've left into
barren wastelands whilst Europe becomes ever more pressured and
crowded. It's not about pushing the problem onto Italy, Spain or
anywhere else.
I'm not sufficiently
arrogant to think I have all the answers, but since I don't like what
I see and have taken the trouble to speak out and write about it I
feel I should at least suggest answers to the questions above for
consideration.
Of course we should
save lives at sea. Should we destroy the people trafficking industry?
It may not be easy, but I believe we should use all the resources we
have available to fight any evil. Whether or not to return people
whence they came is a hugely contentious question, but it needs to be
faced up to, without the assumption that to say yes brands someone
racist or a bigot. The problems of unrestrained mass migration are
real. Rescue and welcome people and more will come, obviously. So
yes, sadly I believe we must send people back, but we have to try and
help them in their own countries too, whether that is through aid,
diplomacy, peace keeping, or more likely a mixture of all three.
Many people are fleeing
war, or smaller internal civil and tribal conflicts, we simply have
to end war, before war ends us. It's not sustainable to keep taking
people in ad infinitum so that the numbers looking to enter increase
exponentially year on year. So, like it or not, we have to face up to
the problems in Africa and the Middle East, we need more creative
solutions from the people who've put themselves forward to govern, we
need peace, not to just send ships from all over to fish people out
of the sea and dump them on Italy.
No comments:
Post a Comment